NG+ | paradoxus (1698)

vs

Cimba (1649)

— 2 — 4 33.33% — 66.67%

Head to Head

	NG+ \| paradoxus Alisa 1591 -10	2-3	1630 +9 Paul Cimba	h2h
	NG+ \| paradoxus Alisa 1578 +12	3-1	1642 -13 Paul Cimba	h2h
	NG+ \| paradoxus Alisa 1587 -10	2-3	1633 +9 Paul Cimba	h2h
	NG+ \| paradoxus Alisa 1513 -11	0-3	1523 +10 Paul Cimba	h2h
	NG+ \| paradoxus Alisa 1502 +11	3-2	1535 -12 Paul Cimba	h2h
	NG+ \| paradoxus Alisa 1512 -11	0-3	1525 +10 Paul Cimba	h2h

Found 6 games.