SQBS (1641)

vs

variant (1622)

— 3 — 2 60.00% — 40.00%

Head to Head

	SQBS Feng 1599 -13	0-3	1532 +12 Clive variant	h2h
	SQBS Feng 1590 +9	3-2	1541 -9 Clive variant	h2h
	SQBS Feng 1603 -13	0-3	1528 +12 Clive variant	h2h
	SQBS Feng 1570 +9	3-1	1542 -10 Clive variant	h2h
	SQBS Feng 1560 +10	3-2	1552 -11 Clive variant	h2h

Found 5 games.