Cimba (1649)

vs

NG+ | paradoxus (1698)

— 4 — 2 66.67% — 33.33%

Head to Head

	Cimba Paul 1630 +9	3-2	1591 -10 Alisa NG+ \| paradoxus	h2h
	Cimba Paul 1642 -13	1-3	1578 +12 Alisa NG+ \| paradoxus	h2h
	Cimba Paul 1633 +9	3-2	1587 -10 Alisa NG+ \| paradoxus	h2h
	Cimba Paul 1523 +10	3-0	1513 -11 Alisa NG+ \| paradoxus	h2h
	Cimba Paul 1535 -12	2-3	1502 +11 Alisa NG+ \| paradoxus	h2h
	Cimba Paul 1525 +10	3-0	1512 -11 Alisa NG+ \| paradoxus	h2h

Found 6 games.