| nack1996 vs Lidia | 2–4 | 33.33% |
| nack1996 vs Hwoarang | 4–1 | 80.00% |
| nack1996 vs Azucena | 2–3 | 40.00% |
| nack1996 vs King | 2–2 | 50.00% |
| nack1996 vs Steve | 2–2 | 50.00% |
| nack1996 vs Jin | 2–1 | 66.67% |
| nack1996 vs Lili | 2–1 | 66.67% |
| nack1996 vs Victor | 2–1 | 66.67% |
| nack1996 vs Yoshimitsu | 2–0 | 100.00% |
| nack1996 vs Xiaoyu | 2–0 | 100.00% |
| nack1996 vs Dragunov | 2–0 | 100.00% |
| nack1996 vs Leo | 2–0 | 100.00% |
| nack1996 vs Fahkumram | 2–0 | 100.00% |
| nack1996 vs Claudio | 1–0 | 100.00% |
| nack1996 vs Jun | 1–0 | 100.00% |
| nack1996 vs Heihachi | 1–0 | 100.00% |
| nack1996 vs Clive | 1–0 | 100.00% |
| nack1996 vs Anna | 1–0 | 100.00% |
Limitations
This data is often requested to give insight into which characters you have more trouble with than others, but it is not particularly helpful for that. The main issue is that it is heavily skewed by how strong the opponents you play are.
For example, this data suggests my worst matchup is clearly vs Reina, but that's just because most of those games are vs Yagami.
There is a way to account for this being worked on. The central idea is to assign each matchup a rating vs you which adjusts based on the result, much like the regular rating but also based on the rating of each player. With this, it would give a better summary of how well you perform vs each character.
In the meantime, this page is here to present the data as requested.