| SJ|Eclypse vs Clive | 12–9 | 57.14% |
| SJ|Eclypse vs Bryan | 6–10 | 37.50% |
| SJ|Eclypse vs Jin | 9–6 | 60.00% |
| SJ|Eclypse vs Hwoarang | 9–4 | 69.23% |
| SJ|Eclypse vs Eddy | 2–11 | 15.38% |
| SJ|Eclypse vs Kazuya | 8–4 | 66.67% |
| SJ|Eclypse vs King | 4–7 | 36.36% |
| SJ|Eclypse vs Nina | 5–6 | 45.45% |
| SJ|Eclypse vs Jun | 9–2 | 81.82% |
| SJ|Eclypse vs Leo | 5–5 | 50.00% |
| SJ|Eclypse vs Heihachi | 8–2 | 80.00% |
| SJ|Eclypse vs Paul | 5–4 | 55.56% |
| SJ|Eclypse vs Law | 5–4 | 55.56% |
| SJ|Eclypse vs Yoshimitsu | 5–4 | 55.56% |
| SJ|Eclypse vs Xiaoyu | 4–4 | 50.00% |
| SJ|Eclypse vs Devil Jin | 3–5 | 37.50% |
| SJ|Eclypse vs Lee | 3–5 | 37.50% |
| SJ|Eclypse vs Reina | 5–3 | 62.50% |
| SJ|Eclypse vs Asuka | 3–4 | 42.86% |
| SJ|Eclypse vs Feng | 5–2 | 71.43% |
| SJ|Eclypse vs Alisa | 4–3 | 57.14% |
| SJ|Eclypse vs Leroy | 3–4 | 42.86% |
| SJ|Eclypse vs Claudio | 3–2 | 60.00% |
| SJ|Eclypse vs Kuma | 0–4 | 0.00% |
| SJ|Eclypse vs Victor | 3–1 | 75.00% |
| SJ|Eclypse vs Raven | 2–2 | 50.00% |
| SJ|Eclypse vs Lars | 2–1 | 66.67% |
| SJ|Eclypse vs Shaheen | 2–1 | 66.67% |
| SJ|Eclypse vs Lidia | 2–1 | 66.67% |
| SJ|Eclypse vs Steve | 2–0 | 100.00% |
| SJ|Eclypse vs Lili | 2–0 | 100.00% |
| SJ|Eclypse vs Dragunov | 2–0 | 100.00% |
| SJ|Eclypse vs Azucena | 0–2 | 0.00% |
Limitations
This data is often requested to give insight into which characters you have more trouble with than others, but it is not particularly helpful for that. The main issue is that it is heavily skewed by how strong the opponents you play are.
For example, this data suggests my worst matchup is clearly vs Reina, but that's just because most of those games are vs Yagami.
There is a way to account for this being worked on. The central idea is to assign each matchup a rating vs you which adjusts based on the result, much like the regular rating but also based on the rating of each player. With this, it would give a better summary of how well you perform vs each character.
In the meantime, this page is here to present the data as requested.