| Dean Lundh vs King | 3–3 | 50.00% |
| Dean Lundh vs Devil Jin | 4–2 | 66.67% |
| Dean Lundh vs Azucena | 4–1 | 80.00% |
| Dean Lundh vs Bryan | 3–1 | 75.00% |
| Dean Lundh vs Kazuya | 2–2 | 50.00% |
| Dean Lundh vs Steve | 1–3 | 25.00% |
| Dean Lundh vs Reina | 2–2 | 50.00% |
| Dean Lundh vs Eddy | 2–2 | 50.00% |
| Dean Lundh vs Clive | 1–3 | 25.00% |
| Dean Lundh vs Jin | 1–1 | 50.00% |
| Dean Lundh vs Lili | 2–0 | 100.00% |
| Dean Lundh vs Kuma | 1–1 | 50.00% |
| Dean Lundh vs Victor | 0–2 | 0.00% |
| Dean Lundh vs Raven | 2–0 | 100.00% |
| Dean Lundh vs Miary Zo | 0–2 | 0.00% |
| Dean Lundh vs Law | 1–0 | 100.00% |
| Dean Lundh vs Lars | 0–1 | 0.00% |
| Dean Lundh vs Lidia | 1–0 | 100.00% |
Limitations
This data is often requested to give insight into which characters you have more trouble with than others, but it is not particularly helpful for that. The main issue is that it is heavily skewed by how strong the opponents you play are.
For example, this data suggests my worst matchup is clearly vs Reina, but that's just because most of those games are vs Yagami.
There is a way to account for this being worked on. The central idea is to assign each matchup a rating vs you which adjusts based on the result, much like the regular rating but also based on the rating of each player. With this, it would give a better summary of how well you perform vs each character.
In the meantime, this page is here to present the data as requested.