| LuDi vs Kazuya | 119–71 | 62.63% |
| LuDi vs Bryan | 76–79 | 49.03% |
| LuDi vs Paul | 91–51 | 64.08% |
| LuDi vs Hwoarang | 86–49 | 63.70% |
| LuDi vs King | 84–48 | 63.64% |
| LuDi vs Dragunov | 67–61 | 52.34% |
| LuDi vs Jin | 77–45 | 63.11% |
| LuDi vs Reina | 71–42 | 62.83% |
| LuDi vs Lidia | 72–40 | 64.29% |
| LuDi vs Lili | 67–35 | 65.69% |
| LuDi vs Heihachi | 51–50 | 50.50% |
| LuDi vs Steve | 40–45 | 47.06% |
| LuDi vs Asuka | 47–34 | 58.02% |
| LuDi vs Nina | 42–29 | 59.15% |
| LuDi vs Law | 40–27 | 59.70% |
| LuDi vs Claudio | 40–22 | 64.52% |
| LuDi vs Leroy | 30–32 | 48.39% |
| LuDi vs Lars | 29–32 | 47.54% |
| LuDi vs Jack-8 | 28–30 | 48.28% |
| LuDi vs Clive | 21–37 | 36.21% |
| LuDi vs Yoshimitsu | 26–29 | 47.27% |
| LuDi vs Feng | 25–30 | 45.45% |
| LuDi vs Jun | 29–26 | 52.73% |
| LuDi vs Alisa | 36–16 | 69.23% |
| LuDi vs Azucena | 24–24 | 50.00% |
| LuDi vs Devil Jin | 27–19 | 58.70% |
| LuDi vs Victor | 21–25 | 45.65% |
| LuDi vs Fahkumram | 28–18 | 60.87% |
| LuDi vs Lee | 23–22 | 51.11% |
| LuDi vs Leo | 20–21 | 48.78% |
| LuDi vs Shaheen | 21–13 | 61.76% |
| LuDi vs Kuma | 12–21 | 36.36% |
| LuDi vs Xiaoyu | 11–18 | 37.93% |
| LuDi vs Eddy | 18–11 | 62.07% |
| LuDi vs Zafina | 9–13 | 40.91% |
| LuDi vs Anna | 10–10 | 50.00% |
| LuDi vs Raven | 7–5 | 58.33% |
| LuDi vs Panda | 1–2 | 33.33% |
Limitations
This data is often requested to give insight into which characters you have more trouble with than others, but it is not particularly helpful for that. The main issue is that it is heavily skewed by how strong the opponents you play are.
For example, this data suggests my worst matchup is clearly vs Reina, but that's just because most of those games are vs Yagami.
There is a way to account for this being worked on. The central idea is to assign each matchup a rating vs you which adjusts based on the result, much like the regular rating but also based on the rating of each player. With this, it would give a better summary of how well you perform vs each character.
In the meantime, this page is here to present the data as requested.